Re: 2.2 -> 2.4 transition questions

From: Oliver Xymoron (oxymoron@waste.org)
Date: Sat Oct 14 2000 - 11:19:05 EDT

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: ide-scsi + /dev/dsp == solid lockup"

Previous message: John Cavan: "Re: lockup with parport_pc on 2.4.0-test10-pre1"
In reply to: Mike A. Harris: "2.2 -> 2.4 transition questions"
Next in thread: Horst von Brand: "Re: 2.2 -> 2.4 transition questions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote:

> The 2.4.0test9 Changes file mentions the following and I'd like
> to know if after installing updated packages, if I'll still be
> able to use a 2.2.x kernel ok, or if I'll have to resort to
> initscript trickery:
>
> Will the following work with 2.2.17 as well?
>
> o util-linux 2.10o # kbdrate -v
> o modutils 2.3.15 # insmod -V
> o PPP 2.4.0 # pppd --version

Debian-unstable has those versions or newer (modutils is .17), but still
comes with a 2.2 kernel. And there are a lot of people running unstable.

-- "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.."

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: ide-scsi + /dev/dsp == solid lockup"
Previous message: John Cavan: "Re: lockup with parport_pc on 2.4.0-test10-pre1"
In reply to: Mike A. Harris: "2.2 -> 2.4 transition questions"
Next in thread: Horst von Brand: "Re: 2.2 -> 2.4 transition questions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Oct 14 2000 - 11:24:23 EDT