Re: 2.4 MM overview?

From: Kenn Humborg (kenn@linux.ie)
Date: Sun Oct 15 2000 - 15:55:56 EDT

Next message: Tigran Aivazian: "[patch-2.4.0-test10-pre3] logic of __alloc_pages()."

Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "PATCH 2.4.0.10.3: pc_keyb and q40_keyb cleanup"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4 MM overview?"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4 MM overview?"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4 MM overview?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 08:35:46PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I understand that 2.4 no longer maps all physical memory as 2.2
> > and earlier used to do.
>
> Its really up to you if you choose to do that or not. If you have enough
> address space to create all your virtual and physical mappings without problems,

OK...

> or you have a sane memory management model with tags/spaces then its a non issue

You've lost me here. Tags/spaces?

Later,
Kenn

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Tigran Aivazian: "[patch-2.4.0-test10-pre3] logic of __alloc_pages()."
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "PATCH 2.4.0.10.3: pc_keyb and q40_keyb cleanup"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4 MM overview?"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4 MM overview?"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4 MM overview?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 15 2000 - 16:09:28 EDT