Re: lowish-lat for 2.4.0-test10-pre3

From: Andi Kleen (ak@suse.de)
Date: Sat Oct 21 2000 - 12:40:07 EDT

Next message: Ashutosh S. Rajekar: "wierd behaviour with hard disks"

Previous message: Dan Kegel: "Re: what is the most efficient wakeup method (signals,msgs,semaphores) ?"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "lowish-lat for 2.4.0-test10-pre3"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: lowish-lat for 2.4.0-test10-pre3"
Reply: Andrew Morton: "Re: lowish-lat for 2.4.0-test10-pre3"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 12:58:00AM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote:
> reschedule:
> + sti
> call SYMBOL_NAME(schedule) # test

The sti can be removed because one of the first things schedule() does is a
sti [forgot to mention that earlier]

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ashutosh S. Rajekar: "wierd behaviour with hard disks"
Previous message: Dan Kegel: "Re: what is the most efficient wakeup method (signals,msgs,semaphores) ?"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "lowish-lat for 2.4.0-test10-pre3"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: lowish-lat for 2.4.0-test10-pre3"
Reply: Andrew Morton: "Re: lowish-lat for 2.4.0-test10-pre3"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Oct 21 2000 - 12:44:02 EDT