Re: 2.4.0-testx fr0kedness?

From: Jason Slagle (raistlin@tacorp.net)
Date: Sat Oct 21 2000 - 20:03:28 EDT

  • Next message: Andre Hedrick: "Re: 2.4.0-testx fr0kedness?"

    I can try that, although it doesn't seem to hold true that 1) The load
    average would reflect the sluggishness I'm seeing, and 2) w and ps and
    that would hang but other programs would continue to run fine. I'll try
    to get some strace output in a w or something next time it happens.

    Jason

    ---
    Jason Slagle - CCNA - CCDA
    Network Administrator - Toledo Internet Access - Toledo Ohio
    - raistlin@tacorp.net - jslagle@toledolink.com - WHOIS JS10172
    -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
    Version: 3.12 GE d-- s:+ a-- C++ UL+++ P--- L+++ E- W- N+ o-- K- w---
    O M- V PS+ PE+++ Y+ PGP t+ 5 X+ R tv+ b+ DI+ D G e+ h! r++ y+
    ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
    

    On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Mitchell Blank Jr wrote:

    > It's because we've seen it a hundred zillion times before... weird problems > with overclocked systems that the owners claim "work fine under any other > version, so it must be a kernel bug". > > You could well be on the edge of where overclocking breaks down. There's > some sequence of instructions and/or memory access in the kernel that is > causing your particular CPU to croak every billionth time through. Maybe > previous kernel compiles didn't emit those exact instructions and you > lucked out.

    - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Oct 21 2000 - 20:06:21 EDT