Re: 2.4.0-testx fr0kedness?

From: Jason Slagle (raistlin@tacorp.net)
Date: Sat Oct 21 2000 - 20:06:34 EDT

  • Next message: Andre Hedrick: "Re: 2.4.0-testx fr0kedness?"

    Oooh!

    I'll try this later. Is there any recourse if I have this
    problem? ie: Recall or anything? Or should I just nab another
    board? Different vender?

    I like the BP6 but really don't HAVE to have one since I have 1 IDE device
    and that.

    Jason 

    ---
Jason Slagle - CCNA - CCDA
Network Administrator - Toledo Internet Access - Toledo Ohio
- raistlin@tacorp.net - jslagle@toledolink.com - WHOIS JS10172
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12 GE d-- s:+ a-- C++ UL+++ P--- L+++ E- W- N+ o-- K- w---
O M- V PS+ PE+++ Y+ PGP t+ 5 X+ R tv+ b+ DI+ D G e+ h! r++ y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

    On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Andre Hedrick wrote:

    > On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Jason Slagle wrote:
> 
> > It worked fine under 2.3.x and as a matter of fact worked fine under
> > 2.4.0-test1-4 I believe.
> > 
> > I don't buy a hardware explination when I've been running this setup for
> > well over a year and only just now have problems :)
> 
> Well let me put some authority into his statement.
> 
> Pull off your CASE.
> Enter the BIOS.
> Wave your hand and fingers over the surface of the mainboard.
> Watch your voltages move wildly.
> 
> Now if they are stable and do not change +- 0.01 then you have a stable
> board.  But 95%+ of the people have this problem on the second release of
> the BP6.
> 
> FYI, EMF's change with age, as do the effect Z of the LRC circuits.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Andre Hedrick
> The Linux ATA/IDE guy
> 
> 

    -
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Oct 21 2000 - 20:09:24 EDT