Re: tcp_do_sendmsg() allocation still broken ?

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Sat Oct 28 2000 - 21:34:55 EDT

Next message: Frank Davis: "test10-6: can't mount root partition"

Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: tcp_do_sendmsg() allocation still broken ?"
In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: tcp_do_sendmsg() allocation still broken ?"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: tcp_do_sendmsg() allocation still broken ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 02:16:42 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>

On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 09:13:27PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> Think about nbd.

Making tcp_do_sendmsg use GFP_ATOMIC would make it too unreliable for other
situations. Penalizing the whole system just for nbd is not a good idea.

Andi, sk->allocation not GFP_ATOMIC.

This is such an old topic Andi, I am surprised you forget all these details
so quickly.

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Frank Davis: "test10-6: can't mount root partition"
Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: tcp_do_sendmsg() allocation still broken ?"
In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: tcp_do_sendmsg() allocation still broken ?"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: tcp_do_sendmsg() allocation still broken ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Oct 28 2000 - 21:51:23 EDT