Re: /dev/random probs in 2.4test(12-pre3)

From: Alexander Viro (viro@math.psu.edu)
Date: Sat Dec 02 2000 - 18:34:44 EST

  • Next message: Theodore Y. Ts'o: "Re: Fasttrak100 questions..."

    On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:

    > particularly people who writing network programs. The number of people
    > who assume that they can get an entire (variable-length) RPC packet by
    > doing a single read() call astounds me. TCP doesn't provide message
    > boundaries, never did and never will. The problem is that such program
    > will work on a LAN, and then blow up when you try using them across the
    > real Internet.

    Erm... Not that ignoring the return values was a bright idea, but the
    lack of reliable ordered datagram protocol in IP family is not a good
    thing. It can be implemented over TCP, but it's a big overkill. IL is a
    nice thing to have...

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 02 2000 - 18:35:56 EST