Re: /dev/random probs in 2.4test(12-pre3)

From: Theodore Y. Ts'o (tytso@MIT.EDU)
Date: Sat Dec 02 2000 - 22:01:12 EST

  • Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Transmeta and Linux-2.4.0-test12-pre3 [slightly off-topic]"

       Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 18:34:44 -0500 (EST)
       From: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>

       Erm... Not that ignoring the return values was a bright idea, but the
       lack of reliable ordered datagram protocol in IP family is not a good
       thing. It can be implemented over TCP, but it's a big overkill. IL is a
       nice thing to have...

    You mean RDP (Reliable Data Protocol), RFC-908 and RFC-1151? It
    provides reliable (i.e., will handle retransmission and dropping
    duplicate) datagrams with optional sequencing guarantees if requested by
    the application (but if you don't need sequencing, you don't have to pay
    for it). It's built on top of IP. It's specified, but it never become
    popular. But it *is* a member of the IP family, however neglected and
    ignored it might be.

                                                    - Ted

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 02 2000 - 22:02:56 EST