Re: [RFC] Generic deferred file writing

From: Alexander Viro (viro@math.psu.edu)
Date: Sat Dec 30 2000 - 15:06:54 EST

  • Next message: Dieter Nützel: "Re: test13-pre6 weird with tdfx.o"

    On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, Daniel Phillips wrote:

    > When I saw you put in the if (PageDirty) -->writepage and related code
    > over the last couple of weeks I was wondering if you realize how close
    > we are to having generic deferred file writing in the VFS. I took some
    > time today to code this little hack and it comes awfully close to doing
    > the job. However, *** Warning, do not run this on a machine you care
    > about, it will mess it up ***.
    >
    > The advantages of deferred file writing are pretty obvious. Right now
    > we are deferring just the writeout of data to the disk, but we can also
    > defer the disk mapping, so that metadata blocks don't have to stay
    > around in cache waiting for data blocks to get mapped into them one at
    > a time - a whole group can be done in one flush.

    Except that we've got file-expanding writes outside of ->i_sem. Thanks, but
    no thanks.

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 30 2000 - 15:38:39 EST