Re: [RFC] Generic deferred file writing

From: Chris Wedgwood (cw@f00f.org)
Date: Sat Dec 30 2000 - 20:13:35 EST

  • Next message: davej@suse.de: "Re: TEST13-PRE7 - Nvidia Kernel Module Compile Problem"

    On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 02:02:34AM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

        Yes, we need to add one field to the in-core superblock to do
        this accounting.

    How does this work for filesystems like reisefs which do tail merging
    and other filesystems which might do sub-clock allocation?

    We either need more than one field (or a byte counter) + lock or
    perhaps a generic fields + callback to the fs itself.
        
    > estimate than just the data blocks it should not be hard to add
    > an extra callback to the filesystem.
        
        Yes, I was thinking at this callback too. Such a callback is
        nearly the only support we need from the filesystem to provide
        allocate on flush.

    I think a callback is the way to go.

      --cw
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 30 2000 - 20:43:32 EST