Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com> writes:
> On 30 Dec 2000, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >
> > One other thing to think about for the VFS/MM layer is limiting the
> > total number of dirty pages in the system (to what disk pressure shows
> > the disk can handle), to keep system performance smooth when swapping.
>
> This is a separate issue, and I think that it is most closely tied in to
> the "RSS limit" kind of patches because of the memory mapping issues. If
> you've seen the RSS rlimit patch (it's been posted a few times this week),
> then you could think of that modified by a "Resident writable pages Set
> Size" approach.
Building on the RSS limit approach sounds much simpler then they way
I was thinking.
> Not just for shared mappings - this is also an issue with
> limiting swapout.
>
> (I actually don't think that RSS is all that interesting, it's really the
> "potentially dirty RSS" that counts for VM behaviour - everything else can
> be dropped easily enough)
Definitely.
Now the only tricky bit is how do we sense when we are overloading
the swap disks. Well that is the next step. I'll take a look
and see what it takes to keep statistics on dirty mapped pages.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 30 2000 - 20:48:33 EST