> This is why our next patch will detect the use of gcc 2.96, and complain, in the
> reiserfs Makefile.
What makes you think its gcc 2.96 ?
If the person concerned can clarify what they built with (2.96-69 or
egcs-1.1.2 (kgcc)), that would be useful.
I've certainly done the Reiserfs testing I did with gcc 2.96-69 with no
problems at all. Reiserfsck was having _bad_ problems but I saw those with
egcs-1.1.2 too and I understand there is a new reiserfsck about to appear
or just out which is much better.
[I've been simulating the effect of bad blocks on file systems]
Worse behaviour so far is minixfs. If an inode rewrite fails leaving what
is now a directory as a file the minix fsck prunes the entire subtree. Very
nasty
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 02 2001 - 07:27:14 EST