Re: Fix for include/linux/fs.h in 2.4.0 kernels

From: Graham Murray (graham@barnowl.demon.co.uk)
Date: Sat Feb 03 2001 - 05:09:39 EST

  • Next message: Russell King: "Re: Version 2.4.1 has ext2 problems."

    Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au> writes:

    > This has all been thrashed out before. Read the threads
    >
    > linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu/2000-month-07/msg04096.html">http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu/2000-month-07/msg04096.html
    > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg18256.html">http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg18256.html

    I don't think that these address my question. I was asking about when
    building (upgrading) glibc from source. I believe that the glibc
    headers are "derived" from the kernel against which it is built. So,
    irrespective of what the glibc maintainers do, would it be advisable
    for the user to remove the symlinks and copy the directories from the
    kernel tree and into /usr/include?
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 03 2001 - 05:11:18 EST