Re: Unresolved symbols for wavelan_cs in 2.4.1-ac9

• Previous message: Marcelo Tosatti: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4.0-ac8/9 page_launder() fix"
• Maybe in reply to: Dag Wieers: "Unresolved symbols for wavelan_cs in 2.4.1-ac9"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:

>> Rejected. It is meant not to be there.
>
> To be more specific ... __bad_udelay() is meant to be an
> unresolvable symbol, which is referenced when people call
> udelay with a "wrong" timeout.

Maybe this (and similar situations) could be added to the lkml-FAQ ?
It would have prevented me to post it on lkml ;)

Thanks,

-- dag wieers, <dag@mind.be>, http://mind.be/ --
            Out of swap, out of luck.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Lukasz Trabinski: "2.2.19pre9 & aic7xxx"
• Previous message: Marcelo Tosatti: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4.0-ac8/9 page_launder() fix"
• Maybe in reply to: Dag Wieers: "Unresolved symbols for wavelan_cs in 2.4.1-ac9"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 10 2001 - 19:50:18 EST