Re: SMP: bind process to cpu

From: Francis Galiegue (fg@mandrakesoft.com)
Date: Sat Feb 17 2001 - 14:57:10 EST

Next message: Michael Bacarella: "Re: Linux stifles innovation..."

Previous message: Jeremy Jackson: "Re: re. too long mac address for --mac-source netfilter option"
In reply to: Thomas Widmann: "Re: SMP: bind process to cpu"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: SMP: bind process to cpu"
Next in thread: Tim Hockin: "Re: SMP: bind process to cpu"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 17 Feb 2001, Thomas Widmann wrote:

>
> #cat /proc/1310/cpus_allowed
> ffffffff
>
> Now, if i want to run this process on only one cpu, i which way
> do i have to set the bitmask ?
> Let's say, i want to run it on cpu0. how look's the bitmask ?
>

Wild guess: as this is a bitmask, you must "or" the bitmask with (1 <<
cpu_number). 1 for CPU 0 only, 5 for CPU 0 and 2, etc, etc.

-- Francis Galiegue, fg@mandrakesoft.com - Normand et fier de l'être "Programming is a race between programmers, who try and make more and more idiot-proof software, and universe, which produces more and more remarkable idiots. Until now, universe leads the race" -- R. Cook

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Michael Bacarella: "Re: Linux stifles innovation..."
Previous message: Jeremy Jackson: "Re: re. too long mac address for --mac-source netfilter option"
In reply to: Thomas Widmann: "Re: SMP: bind process to cpu"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: SMP: bind process to cpu"
Next in thread: Tim Hockin: "Re: SMP: bind process to cpu"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 17 2001 - 14:55:55 EST