Alexey,
Damn you are quick! :) Testing immediately
Cheers
Chris
On Sat, 17 Feb 2001 kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote:
> Hello!
>
> > Unfortunately, it seems to be very buggy. Here are two buggy scenarios.
>
>
> --- ../vger3-010210/linux/net/ipv4/tcp.c Sat Feb 10 23:16:51 2001
> +++ linux/net/ipv4/tcp.c Sat Feb 17 23:27:43 2001
> @@ -691,6 +691,8 @@
>
> set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
>
> + if (!timeo)
> + break;
> if (signal_pending(current))
> break;
> if (tcp_memory_free(sk) && !vm_wait)
> --- ../vger3-010210/linux/net/core/sock.c Tue Jan 30 21:20:16 2001
> +++ linux/net/core/sock.c Sat Feb 17 23:27:44 2001
> @@ -727,6 +727,8 @@
> clear_bit(SOCK_ASYNC_NOSPACE, &sk->socket->flags);
> add_wait_queue(sk->sleep, &wait);
> for (;;) {
> + if (!timeo)
> + break;
> if (signal_pending(current))
> break;
> set_bit(SOCK_NOSPACE, &sk->socket->flags);
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 17 2001 - 16:57:30 EST