Re: [patch] serial console vs NMI watchdog

From: Ion Badulescu (ionut@moisil.cs.columbia.edu)
Date: Fri Mar 09 2001 - 11:35:48 EST

Next message: Mike Galbraith: "Re: Ramdisk (and other) problems with 2.4.2"

Previous message: David Brownell: "Re: SLAB vs. pci_alloc_xxx in usb-uhci patch [RFC: API]"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "[patch] serial console vs NMI watchdog"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: [patch] serial console vs NMI watchdog"
Next in thread: Robert Read: "Re: [patch] serial console vs NMI watchdog"
Reply: Andrew Morton: "Re: [patch] serial console vs NMI watchdog"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 10 Mar 2001 01:21:25 +1100, Andrew Morton <andrewm@uow.edu.au> wrote:

> +/**
> + * enable_nmi_watchdog - enables/disables NMI watchdog checking.
> + * @yes: If zero, disable

Ugh. I have a feeling that your chances to get Linus to accept this are
extremely slim.

Just have two functions, enable_nmi_watchdog and disable_nmi_watchdog.
You can make them inline, or even macros...

Ion

-- 
  It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool,
            than to open it and remove all doubt.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mike Galbraith: "Re: Ramdisk (and other) problems with 2.4.2"
Previous message: David Brownell: "Re: SLAB vs. pci_alloc_xxx in usb-uhci patch [RFC: API]"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "[patch] serial console vs NMI watchdog"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: [patch] serial console vs NMI watchdog"
Next in thread: Robert Read: "Re: [patch] serial console vs NMI watchdog"
Reply: Andrew Morton: "Re: [patch] serial console vs NMI watchdog"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 09 2001 - 11:41:46 EST