Brian Gerst wrote:
> Gérard Roudier wrote:
> > Given your description, this board is certainly not a multi-fonction PCI
> > device. Multi-function PCI devices provide separate resources for each
> > function in a way that allows each function to be driven by separate
> > software drivers. A single function PCI device that provides several
> > functionnalities commonly handled by separate sub-systems, is nothing but
> > a bag of shit we should not want to support in any O/S in my opinion.
> > Let me claim that ingenieers that want O/Ses to support such hardware are
> > either morons or bastards.
>
> Unfortunately, Windoze supports this configuration, and that's enough
> for most hardware designers. This is also an issue with the joystick
> ports on many PCI sound cards. We're not in a position to get up on the
> soap box and decree this hardware "a bag of shit" though, yet.
>
> PS. I have run into this issue before with joystick ports on many PCI
> sound cards. The only one that I found that did it right (seperate PCI
> function for the game port) was the SBLive.
We -can- support multifunction cards such and these, and no we don't
need to hack the infrastructure to do it. You might need to hack the
subsystem drivers a bit to make them more flexible, but that's it.
WRT the specific example of joystick ports, it is already possible for a
sound driver to register a joystick port. No problem there either.
Jeff
-- Jeff Garzik | Sam: "Mind if I drive?" Building 1024 | Max: "Not if you don't mind me clawing at the dash MandrakeSoft | and shrieking like a cheerleader." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 07 2001 - 13:55:02 EDT