Athlon runtime problems

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Sat Apr 14 2001 - 11:12:09 EDT

Next message: Rik van Riel: "Re: PATCH(?): linux-2.4.4-pre2: fork should run child first"

Previous message: Kurt Roeckx: "KERNEL: assertion (tp->lost_out == 0) failed at tcp_input.c(1202):tcp_remove_reno_sacks"
Next in thread: Tim lawless: "Re: Athlon runtime problems"
Reply: Tim lawless: "Re: Athlon runtime problems"
Reply: Kurt Roeckx: "Re: Athlon runtime problems"
Reply: Jeff Lightfoot: "Re: Athlon runtime problems"
Reply: Moses Mcknight: "Re: Athlon runtime problems"
Reply: Disconnect: "Re: Athlon runtime problems"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Can the folks who are seeing crashes running athlon optimised kernels all mail
me

- CPU model/stepping
- Chipset
- Amount of RAM
- /proc/mtrr output
- compiler used

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Rik van Riel: "Re: PATCH(?): linux-2.4.4-pre2: fork should run child first"
Previous message: Kurt Roeckx: "KERNEL: assertion (tp->lost_out == 0) failed at tcp_input.c(1202):tcp_remove_reno_sacks"
Next in thread: Tim lawless: "Re: Athlon runtime problems"
Reply: Tim lawless: "Re: Athlon runtime problems"
Reply: Kurt Roeckx: "Re: Athlon runtime problems"
Reply: Jeff Lightfoot: "Re: Athlon runtime problems"
Reply: Moses Mcknight: "Re: Athlon runtime problems"
Reply: Disconnect: "Re: Athlon runtime problems"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 14 2001 - 11:12:01 EDT