Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution system

From: Andi Kleen (ak@suse.de)
Date: Sat Apr 21 2001 - 15:42:10 EDT

Next message: Dan Aloni: "Re: cdrom driver dependency problem (and a workaround patch)"

Previous message: Victor Julien: "Re: 2.4.3+ sound distortion"
In reply to: Henning P. Schmiedehausen: "Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution system"
Next in thread: Giacomo A. Catenazzi: "Re: [kbuild-devel] Request for comment -- a better attribution system"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 04:38:59PM +0000, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
> What's wrong with:
[...xml horror deleted...]

The myriads of external tools/libraries you will need (and that usually do not
work properly, spewing out undecryptable error messages, or are currently not
installed on your machine) and the near impossibility to process XML files
with standard unix text tools in a meaningfull way?

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Dan Aloni: "Re: cdrom driver dependency problem (and a workaround patch)"
Previous message: Victor Julien: "Re: 2.4.3+ sound distortion"
In reply to: Henning P. Schmiedehausen: "Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution system"
Next in thread: Giacomo A. Catenazzi: "Re: [kbuild-devel] Request for comment -- a better attribution system"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 21 2001 - 15:46:26 EDT