Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution system

From: Francois Romieu (romieu@cogenit.fr)
Date: Sat Apr 21 2001 - 17:11:06 EDT

  • Next message: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution system"

    Eric S. Raymond <esr@thyrsus.com> ecrit :
    [...]
    > One of the problems this `overdesign' can help solve is actually identifying
    > the parts that have semi-permanent maintainers, and the parts that don't.
    >
    > One way to use the meta-information, for example, would be to use it to
    > periodically poll maintainers to find out if they're still active.
    >
    > Another is to be able to generate reports on exactly how much of the kernel
    > is in "Maintained" or "Supported" status. I think it would be worth
    > making this change just so we could know that.

                                      Y N
    The kernel will perform better [ ] [ ]
    Somebody will have less work [ ] [ ]
    It's fun (TM) [ ] [ ] 

    -- 
Ueimor - cd /pub
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 21 2001 - 17:13:40 EDT