Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution system

From: Francois Romieu (romieu@cogenit.fr)
Date: Sat Apr 21 2001 - 18:30:57 EDT

  • Next message: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution system"

    Eric S. Raymond <esr@thyrsus.com> ecrit :
    > Francois Romieu <romieu@cogenit.fr>:
    [...]
    > > Somebody will have less work [*] [ ]
    >
    > Yes, anybody trying to figure out how to get a fix made.

    Provided it's kept up-to-date. I.e. it calls for some tools (and these
    require the suggested changes).

    > > It's fun (TM) [*] [ ]
    >
    > Fun for me. I like solving global problems rather than just local ones.

    I'll only object that imvvvvho there is no global problem here:
    * If user meets a serious problem, the maintainer will surely ask
    him to test some fix, to specify some point or whatever. Thanks to
    System, user will save 5 or 10 minutes. To be compared to the time spent
    with said maintainer or preparing the bug report.
    * If user don't know how to submit and don't use some exotic driver, I bet
    he will start by posting to l-k and be eventually redirected.
    * If user has identified problem with his FooBar SS6 adapter, chances
    are that he knows who he should reach.

    I have no problem with it but I'm not sure it's *really* useful.

    -- 
    Ueimor
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 21 2001 - 18:34:29 EDT