Re: VIA's Southbridge bug: Latest (pseudo-)patch

From: Ingo Oeser (ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de)
Date: Sat May 19 2001 - 20:44:49 EDT

  • Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device arguments from lookup)"

    On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 05:11:30PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
    > If it had been a manufacturer in most respectable areas of business they'd be
    > recalling and reissuing components, and paying for the end resllers to notify
    > each customer

    This is consumer hardware. Consumer products are optimized for a
    good buzzword count per $ ratio. Everything else is secondary.

    Producing cheap stuff has its price. And being so smart an buing
    cheapest available has the same price. QA and recalling are
    expensive as hell. That's why cheap products usally have this
    quality tradeoff.

    Most consumers don't like to pay for quality.

    Germany has learned this lesson and thus "Made in Germany"
    doesn't mean anything for certain products anymore :-(

    Regards

    Ingo Oeser 

    -- 
To the systems programmer,
users and applications serve only to provide a test load.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat May 19 2001 - 20:52:24 EDT