Jeff, Thanks for copying netdev. Wish more people would do that.
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Bogdan Costescu wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > The loss and regain of link status should be proactively signalled to
> > userspace using netlink or something similar.
>
> [ For the general discussion ]
> I fully agree, but I just wanted to give an example of legit use from
> user space of _current_ values from hardware.
>
> > Currently we have
> > netif_carrier_{on,off,ok} but it is only passively checked.
> > netif_carrier_{on,off} should probably schedule_task() to fire off a
> > netlink message...
>
> [ Link status details ]
> Just that not all NICs have hardware support (and/or not all drivers use
> these facilities) for link status change notification using interrupts.
> Right now, most drivers _poll_ for media status and based on the poll
> rate, netif_carrier routines are (or should be) called. We can't make the
> poll rate very small for the general case, as MII access is time
> consuming (same discussion was some months ago when the bonding driver
> was updated). However, for users who know that they need this info to be
> more accurate (at the expense of CPU time), polling through ioctl's is the
> only solution.
Not really.
One idea i have been toying with is to maintain hysteris or threshold of
some form in dev_watchdog;
example: if watchdog timer expires threshold times, you declare the link
dead and send netif_carrier_off netlink message.
On recovery, you send netif_carrier_on
Assumption:
If the tx path is blocked, more than likely the link is down.
cheers,
jamal
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 01 2001 - 10:21:07 EDT